<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avere Systems shows first benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://storage-news.com/2009/10/12/avere-systems-shows-first-benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://storage-news.com/2009/10/12/avere-systems-shows-first-benchmarks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:58:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JYM</title>
		<link>http://storage-news.com/2009/10/12/avere-systems-shows-first-benchmarks/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>JYM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://storage-news.com/?p=914#comment-325</guid>
		<description>What does this mean? 
 
&quot;...the list immediately shows that all other products are &#8220;traditional&#8221; NFS servers, not caching products.&quot; 
 
Several tested systems use more DRAM and deliver far less performance. 
 
Re: &quot;...1.38ms ORT&#8221; is a bit misleading. According to the actual benchmark results available here, the response time was 4.6ms when reaching the 131,591 IOPS; which is significantly higher.&quot; 
 
That&#039;s how this benchmark works -- this is true of ALL SPEC results. When SPEC says &quot;ORT&quot;, it stands for &quot;Overall Response Time&quot; and it&#039;s consistent across all reported results across all vendors. 
 
Consider...competitive systems need 600-900 spindles to get this many IOPS. Think dollars-per-IOPS and power-per-IOPS! Bottom line, 131K SPEC-ops using only 79 spindles is absolutely stunning. 
 
And they do it without Flash!!! 
 
 
 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does this mean? </p>
<p>&quot;&#8230;the list immediately shows that all other products are &ldquo;traditional&rdquo; NFS servers, not caching products.&quot; </p>
<p>Several tested systems use more DRAM and deliver far less performance. </p>
<p>Re: &quot;&#8230;1.38ms ORT&rdquo; is a bit misleading. According to the actual benchmark results available here, the response time was 4.6ms when reaching the 131,591 IOPS; which is significantly higher.&quot; </p>
<p>That&#039;s how this benchmark works &#8212; this is true of ALL SPEC results. When SPEC says &quot;ORT&quot;, it stands for &quot;Overall Response Time&quot; and it&#039;s consistent across all reported results across all vendors. </p>
<p>Consider&#8230;competitive systems need 600-900 spindles to get this many IOPS. Think dollars-per-IOPS and power-per-IOPS! Bottom line, 131K SPEC-ops using only 79 spindles is absolutely stunning. </p>
<p>And they do it without Flash!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

